





Discover the valuable insights our consultants provide. Subscribe to our Insights blog to receive email alerts whenever we post something new!
Published on: Sep 16, 2025 9:00:00 AM by Sandra Wojtysiak
Updated on: September 16, 2025
Choosing an inventory valuation method is important for any company that carries inventory on its balance sheet. However, determining which method is best is not always straightforward.
The common response might be, “That’s a question for the accounting department.”
While accounting usually makes the final decision, anyone working with inventory needs to understand the different valuation methods and how each transaction impacts financials.
Building this understanding helps bridge the gap between supply chain and accounting, reducing confusion and preventing headaches down the road.
As the name suggests, this method assumes the oldest inventory on hand is the first to be used, sold, or disposed of. It’s commonly applied in the food processing industry, where using the oldest ingredients first helps maintain freshness. The cost tied to those oldest items is recorded as the value issued.
Under this method, the value of an item is calculated as the average cost of inventory over time. Each time new inventory is received, a new average cost is computed. For example, a manufacturer purchasing bolts for production might pay $0.10 per bolt on one delivery and $0.12 per bolt on another. After each receipt, the costs are averaged, resulting in a new unit cost that reflects all purchases to date.
Each item (or SKU) is assigned a fixed “standard” cost. Inventory value is then calculated simply as Standard Cost × Quantity on Hand. All receipts, disposals, and shipments are recorded at this same standard cost, regardless of actual purchase or production price. For example, in a facility producing large volumes of identical items (such as coffee cups) every cup carries the same assigned cost, no matter when or by whom it was made.
This method recognizes that even items with the same inventory ID (SKU) may have unique features that impact their cost or value. For example, consider a set of ten bikes built with the same frame. Some may have upgraded brakes, tires, or cranksets. As a result, each bike carries a different cost of production.
This method assumes the most recently acquired inventory is sold first. However, because it often reduces taxable income while leaving older, potentially obsolete inventory costs on the balance sheet, LIFO is generally not accepted under most accounting standards. For this reason, we will not cover it in detail.
Now, let’s get into what characteristics to look for in the business to determine the best valuation method:
Weighted Average |
|
FIFO |
|
Standard |
|
Specific ID |
|
How does this translate to the real world? Here are some examples to help illustrate each method.
Example |
A manufacturer that sells machines and related accessories often purchases components and hardware from suppliers. At times, costs may decrease compared to prior months due to improved purchasing practices or vendor discounts. Rather than making certain orders appear more profitable simply because the lower-cost receipts happened to align with specific sales, the weighted average method spreads those cost savings across all current inventory. This ensures a consistent unit cost is applied to items moving forward. |
Example |
Some types of inventory, such as items with expiration dates, naturally require a first-in, first-out approach. By shipping or using the oldest stock first, companies ensure products remain fresh and minimize waste. Even when items do not expire, such as hardware or general merchandise, FIFO can still be valuable. It helps maintain consistent cost flow and prevents older inventory from sitting too long in storage, which could otherwise lead to obsolescence or damage over time. |
Example |
In some production environments, items are manufactured in batches, with certain stages of the process handled by outside vendors. Because lot sizes may vary, actual costs can fluctuate from one batch to another. To avoid the complexity of tracking these variances for every lot, a fixed standard cost per unit is assigned. This approach simplifies cost management and provides consistency when evaluating production expenses over time. |
Example |
Certain industries deal with products that may share the same general ID or SKU but differ significantly in their individual features and costs. For example, a group of bikes may share the same frame, yet differ in their brakes, tires, or cranksets. Using specific identification, each bike is valued at its actual cost, ensuring accuracy when variations between items meaningfully affect value. |
Each approach has unique benefits and trade-offs:
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
FIFO |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Standard |
|
|
Specific ID |
|
|
1 Displayed as both an advantage and disadvantage as this can be a requirement for regulated industries. Utilizing a valuation method that enforces this restriction could satisfy the documentation requirement
When it comes time to decide which valuation method works best, many businesses simply choose one approach and apply it across all products. This keeps things straightforward, with a single default method in place. However, there are situations where using more than one method makes sense.
While it’s less common to mix approaches, such as applying FIFO to some items and weighted average to others, it can be practical. For example, purchased items from vendors may be tracked using FIFO or weighted average, while custom-manufactured goods might be valued using specific identification to better capture profit margins on finished products.
Need help determining the right valuation method for your business? SVA Consulting is here to help. Contact us today to learn more.
© 2025 SVA ConsultingShare this post:
Sandra is a Solution Architecture Manager with SVA Consulting.
contact@svaconsulting.com
(800) 366-9091
1221 John Q Hammons Dr., Suite 201, Madison, WI 53717
18650 W. Corporate Dr., Suite 205, Brookfield, WI 53045
1600 Utica Ave S, 9th Floor,
Saint Louis Park, MN 55416
7135 E. Camelback Road, 230, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
109 West Commercial Street, Suite 107, Sanford, FL 32771
©2025 SVA Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | CCPA